I think of it as The Oprah Syndrome.
And if you raise money for a nonprofit, I’m betting you’ve run into it, too.
Picture this: you’re at a board meeting. The topic of discussion is a forecast deficit for the year.
“What are we to do?”, the finance chair moans.
Board members look around, hoping someone else will have a great idea. Otherwise, there will be tough choices. And those are so messy!
Suddenly, one member raises his hand. “Why don’t we ask Oprah for money? She’s got so much! And I’m sure she’d really care about our work.”
Thud.
(That’s the sound of the development director’s head hitting the table.)
There you have it. The Oprah Syndrome.
The quick fix. The silver bullet. The easy answer to all your money woes.
It’s not just the board, though. I’ve seen staff do it, too. And sometimes, there’s no national celebrity involved.
“If we could just call that CEO… I just read in the paper that he makes 10 million a year! Surely we should get some of it?”
Now, if you can find a connection to the CEO, and if he has any interest in what you do – well, then maybe it’s not such a bad idea.
But chances are, you can’t.
And I find the mindset sort of troubling.
It’s not very donor-centric to assume that great wealth means an obligation to give to your organization. Even a billionaire doesn’t want to be loved only for his money.
The other reason this syndrome worries me is the wishful thinking. It’s just plain wasted time and energy. There aren’t really shortcuts.
Fundraising is much more about the daily small steps than about a moon-shot.
While you’re chasing Oprah, you’re not doing the real work of connecting to donors.
So, by all means, work on building connections. That should always be part of it.
Just don’t get sidetracked by sparkly things.
(Though, if you DO know Oprah… would you send me her address? I’ve got a GREAT program that she’d just love…)
greatergoodfundraising says
March 11, 2014 at 9:20 pmMary, I know exactly what you are writing about. I have dealt with those kinds of boards and staff members too. They are as bad as those who spend an incredible amount of time entering the big charity “contests” that are run by big banks like Chase. Donor centered approaches will get you much farther.
Mary Cahalane says
March 11, 2014 at 9:25 pmOh, those contests! As you say, it’s the day to day, every day, building of relationships that matters in the long run.
Thanks, Richard.
Gelinne Deirdre says
March 11, 2014 at 10:38 pmGood one, Mary!
Mary Cahalane says
March 12, 2014 at 11:21 amThanks!
Tracy Moavero (@TracyMoavero) says
March 12, 2014 at 6:26 amAn organization with many small donors has more power to effect change than one with a Fairy Godmother mega donor — or a heavy reliance on grants, for that matter. Not only is a strong base of smaller donors more stable, it has many supporters to spread the word about the org’s work, to take action on policy matters, to provide feedback and much more.
Mary Cahalane says
March 12, 2014 at 7:56 amAbsolutely! It’s crazy to bypass the investment in a strong base of support for a quick fix.
The Other Bottom Line says
March 12, 2014 at 11:21 amI love how much you say in so few words Mary – thanks for this timely post!
Diana
Mary Cahalane says
March 12, 2014 at 11:22 amThank you, Diana!
Gingerheaddad says
March 12, 2014 at 2:25 pmI now have a term for that moment that always makes me go “Doh!” I have learned to always follow it up with “who can call that person to get a golf twosome for tomorrow morning.”
Mary Cahalane says
March 12, 2014 at 3:39 pmExactly, Jim. So, you’ve had this “brilliant” idea… how is it *you* will be making it happen?
And what will we be doing in the meantime?